Sometimes
the most disturbing films are not those that are obviously shocking but those
that slowly creep under your skin and Plein
Soleil (aka Purple Noon) is a classic example of this. The first on-screen
appearance of Patricia Highsmith’s supremely cold-hearted villain Tom Ripley,
director René Clément brilliantly mixes elements of Hitchcock with a decidedly
French New Wave approach, and Alain Delon gives a charismatic, star-making
performance as Ripley.
Based
on Highsmith’s novel “The Talented Ripley” (filmed again in 1999 with Matt
Damon as Ripley), the plot sees Tom Ripley in Italy, living it up on a boat
with his wealthy friend, Philippe Greenleaf (Maurice Ronet). Greenleaf’s father
has employed Ripley to persuade his son to return to the US. However, Greenleaf
Jr., ensconced on a boat, travelling the Italian coast with his girlfriend
Marge, has no such plans – and Ripley may have more sinister intentions than
Philippe realises.
The
relationship between Ripley and Greenleaf drives the first part of the story,
but even that is never entirely straightforward. Ripley starts as a clumsy,
slightly dim, subservient "little brother" to Greenleaf, going along
with his behaviour, as Greenleaf throws his father's money away like confetti. Eventually the whole film starts to revolve
purely around Ripley, and he remains a fascinating, enigmatic character
throughout. His motives are ambiguous, never as simply explainable as, for
example, greed, envy, coveting Marge or even the need to "possess" or
become Greenleaf, even though they may be all or none of those things.
Alain
Delon is magnetic, looking a mixture of baby faced innocence and ridiculously
handsome movie star. He is completely convincing as Ripley, and the switch in
dynamic and behaviour, from charmer to amoral psychopath is creepy and
chilling.
Plein Soleil has a number
parallels with the work of Alfred Hitchcock. Most obviously is the fact that
Hitch made a big screen version of another Highsmith novel, Strangers on a Train. There are other
thematic similarities to the work of Hitchcock, such as murder, loss of
identity, and relationships.
However,
in some ways, in this film at least, Clement is the opposite of Hitchcock. He
employs a number of techniques that are synonymous with the French New Wave of
filmmaking, particularly the way the film is grounded very much in real life.
Therefore, instead of filming the sequences on Greenleaf’s ship in a studio
with an obviously projected backdrop, they are filmed out at sea, with a
handheld camera, on an actual boat. This makes the actual scenes of them
struggling to regain control of the ship in choppy waters, especially when
being thrown overboard, seemingly in the middle of nowhere, almost unbearably
tense, as there are clearly no special effects or stuntmen in use here.
The
only real disappointment is the ending, which deviates from the novel. It feels
like a needless concession to morality and jars noticeably with the amoral tone
of the rest of the film. Nevertheless, there is still an air of ambiguity to
the conclusion, and given the situations, Ripley has previously extricated
himself from, maybe things are not as clear-cut as they might appear.
No comments:
Post a Comment