Magic
in the Moonlight is an affable, distracting, but ultimately unsatisfactory
effort from Woody Allen. The whole thing looks great, the actors do a good job
with what they are given, but the central premise is spread far too thinly to
carry a feature length film, and the dialogue is clunky and awkward.
Colin
Firth plays Stanley, a world famous illusionist, better known as Wei Ling Soo,
who is roped in by an old friend and fellow magician to unmask a psychic,
Sophie (Emma Stone) who is preying on a wealthy friend of his. At first,
Stanley thinks this will be a simple task, but as he gets more involved, he
finds himself starting to doubt his materialistic worldview. Could Sophie
really have the power to talk to the dead? In addition, could Stanley be falling
in love with her?
The
problem, as is so often the case with modern Woody Allen films, is the script,
which feels rushed and poorly thought out, and fails on several levels.
Firstly, the central idea, essentially "is it a bad thing to believe in an
illusion if it makes you happy?" is interesting and thought provoking, but
thinly stretched over a feature length film. Allen has done multiple storyline
films before, such as Hannah and Her Sisters or Crimes and Misdemeanours, and
maybe that approach would have worked better here. To his credit, despite Allen’s
well known atheist leanings, he does not lecture or polemicize in the script.
Secondly,
none of the characters feel as though they are real people, and are only the
doing the things they do because the script says so, not because that is what
the character would do. Stanley’s conversion from devout atheist to true
believer in the afterlife is not in the slightest bit convincing, (especially
given his “thorough” testing of Sophie seems to consist of one séance and her
telling him things about his beloved aunt), and neither is the idea of a love
affair between Stanley and Sophie.
Thirdly,
is the dialogue, which is grating, clunky and artificial sounding, something
that perhaps reads better on a page than coming out of somebody's mouth.
Finally,
and I have no idea if this is done for budgetary or artistic reasons, but there
is far too much “tell don’t show”, with interminable scenes of characters
explaining what has happened off screen, or how they feel, giving some of the
film a turgid lifeless feel. Noticeably absent is any version of "The
Woody Allen character", a staple of his films, whether played by Allen or
an impersonator such as John Cusack in Bullets over Broadway. This character
can usually be relied upon to inject some life into any situation, with his
neuroses and collection of good one liners (another element missing from this
film - it simply is not funny)
However,
if the script is lacking in depth, detail and poetry, then the production
design certainly is not. The costumes, cars and country estates all look
wonderful, but beyond that, help to make the Great Gatsby meets Wodehouse world
completely believable. The music, another staple of Allen films is well chosen,
a mix of well-known and more obscure big band songs from the era.
Sadly,
though, these elements on their own cannot save the film, and Magic in the
Moonlight goes on the "pleasant but forgettable" pile of Woody Allen
films. A shame, as he has shown with Blue Jasmine and Midnight in Paris that
when he spends a bit of time crafting the script he can still make interesting,
thought provoking and funny work. The Allen juggernaut roles ever onwards with
shooting underway on his latest film, so, who knows - maybe next time?
No comments:
Post a Comment